<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joint Task Force PhysX Trailer Released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fun-motion.com/news/joint-task-force-physx-trailer-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fun-motion.com/news/joint-task-force-physx-trailer-released/</link>
	<description>Reviews of physics games, interviews with their game developers, and downloads of physics-based games.  Physics games are simple, addictive, and fun!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wunderbear</title>
		<link>http://www.fun-motion.com/news/joint-task-force-physx-trailer-released/#comment-2159</link>
		<dc:creator>Wunderbear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 17:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fun-motion.com/news/joint-task-force-physx-trailer-released/#comment-2159</guid>
		<description>Ooooooooooooooooooooh.

I want that now. That, and an affordable physics card. Get ATI and Nvidia on the case!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooooooooooooooooooooh.</p>
<p>I want that now. That, and an affordable physics card. Get ATI and Nvidia on the case!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dosou</title>
		<link>http://www.fun-motion.com/news/joint-task-force-physx-trailer-released/#comment-2157</link>
		<dc:creator>Dosou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 16:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fun-motion.com/news/joint-task-force-physx-trailer-released/#comment-2157</guid>
		<description>The only time this will become useful is when physics chips become standard like video cards. I think the idea of working with Nvidia and ATI sounds like a great idea also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only time this will become useful is when physics chips become standard like video cards. I think the idea of working with Nvidia and ATI sounds like a great idea also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Beel</title>
		<link>http://www.fun-motion.com/news/joint-task-force-physx-trailer-released/#comment-2156</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Beel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 15:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fun-motion.com/news/joint-task-force-physx-trailer-released/#comment-2156</guid>
		<description>Cool, I like it! That really looks a lot like Tel Aviv. Nice work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool, I like it! That really looks a lot like Tel Aviv. Nice work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tzarius</title>
		<link>http://www.fun-motion.com/news/joint-task-force-physx-trailer-released/#comment-2154</link>
		<dc:creator>Tzarius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 09:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fun-motion.com/news/joint-task-force-physx-trailer-released/#comment-2154</guid>
		<description>I don't expect much to happen until there's a standardised API (like OpenGL or DirectX). If Ageia decide not to use open standards, and instead charge for devkits/licenses/whatever, then things are going to progress quite slowly.

The best outcome seems to be MS (or even an independent group) developing a standardised API with nonrestrictive usage terms, and working with Nvidia and ATI to get physics chips out into consumers hands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t expect much to happen until there&#8217;s a standardised API (like OpenGL or DirectX). If Ageia decide not to use open standards, and instead charge for devkits/licenses/whatever, then things are going to progress quite slowly.</p>
<p>The best outcome seems to be MS (or even an independent group) developing a standardised API with nonrestrictive usage terms, and working with Nvidia and ATI to get physics chips out into consumers hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fluffy bunny</title>
		<link>http://www.fun-motion.com/news/joint-task-force-physx-trailer-released/#comment-2153</link>
		<dc:creator>fluffy bunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 07:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fun-motion.com/news/joint-task-force-physx-trailer-released/#comment-2153</guid>
		<description>One of the games I'm looking forward to. Everything I've heard about it sounds good, shame it's not getting more coverage from the press.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the games I&#8217;m looking forward to. Everything I&#8217;ve heard about it sounds good, shame it&#8217;s not getting more coverage from the press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dylan</title>
		<link>http://www.fun-motion.com/news/joint-task-force-physx-trailer-released/#comment-2151</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 05:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fun-motion.com/news/joint-task-force-physx-trailer-released/#comment-2151</guid>
		<description>The game looks sweet. I think the destructible enviroment physics will make the game more real.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The game looks sweet. I think the destructible enviroment physics will make the game more real.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
