<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ageia&#8217;s PhysX:  Success or Failure?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fun-motion.com/news/ageias-physx-success-or-failure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fun-motion.com/news/ageias-physx-success-or-failure/</link>
	<description>Reviews of physics games, interviews with their game developers, and downloads of physics-based games.  Physics games are simple, addictive, and fun!</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wunderbear</title>
		<link>http://www.fun-motion.com/news/ageias-physx-success-or-failure/#comment-2386</link>
		<dc:creator>Wunderbear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 13:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fun-motion.com/news/ageias-physx-success-or-failure/#comment-2386</guid>
		<description>Well, I know I was able to run Cellfactor without a physx card. At &#62;1fps. At 512x340 or similar. :D
It's probably more an issue of whether your current system has the power to run it. I know that if I had the money for a physics card, i'd probably be better off upgrading my Radeon 9800SE or my AMD athlon to something a bit peppier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I know I was able to run Cellfactor without a physx card. At &gt;1fps. At 512&#215;340 or similar. :D<br />
It&#8217;s probably more an issue of whether your current system has the power to run it. I know that if I had the money for a physics card, i&#8217;d probably be better off upgrading my Radeon 9800SE or my AMD athlon to something a bit peppier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
